skin ec's vote:
nicholas-1
vs-2
prospect-3
XplicitKontent-4
row-5
los-6
I wanted to get my rankinigs in because i know i am late. My ratings were based on the criteria of (most helpful, to least helpful) IMO the bottom 3 had expo's that simply stated what was wrong with the 2 verses judged. They really didn't even explain why they voted how they did, they just nit picked the verses. I am pressed for time on this round, so i can't go as in depth as I would like, but in short I felt like nicholas and Violent Scripture's expo's were immensly better than the other 4- the criteria given to me was "most helpful". I felt these 2 were the only ones of the 6 that were helpful. Nicholas u did a good job of offering solutions to the flaws you saw. Your expo was critical, yet positive, u offered insight and suggestions without being condescending. i.e ". u should read more battles & find out how to tighten up your multis more"-(los) a FV member should be the one to tell them how they feel like they should go about tightening up there multi's. Violent scripture let's be honest, there is no way you are going to give every battle that much attention. I feel like you def went harder knowing the spotlight was on. But your points were solid, just summarize your advice to the opponents more. The line by line scrutiny was to much
__________________
|