Originally Posted by ELOH_STACKz

Yea, Zimmerman had the right to follow him. But Trayvon also had the right to fight back if HE felt threatened... But, the real crime was when Zimmerman pulled that trigger. That my friends, should have never happened. I mean, pulling the gun out wasn't enough? He had to shoot the poor kid? I mean, I've had a gun pulled on me. Shit stopped me in my tracks. Dead ass, Lol

Well, by your logic, Trayvon had the right to fight back if he felt threatened. If you've seen the injuries of Zimmerman, he was getting his head smashed against the pavement and everything. He would OBVIOUSLY have felt like his life was in danger, as it was because hitting your head off concrete is pretty dangerous at the end of the day. He pulled of his gun and shot to protect himself. All the same, being un-American, I don't think the cunts should have had guns in the first place.

Originally Posted by ELOH_STACKz

Yea, Zimmerman had the right to follow him. But Trayvon also had the right to fight back if HE felt threatened... But, the real crime was when Zimmerman pulled that trigger. That my friends, should have never happened. I mean, pulling the gun out wasn't enough? He had to shoot the poor kid? I mean, I've had a gun pulled on me. Shit stopped me in my tracks. Dead ass, Lol

Well, by your logic, Trayvon had the right to fight back if he felt threatened. If you've seen the injuries of Zimmerman, he was getting his head smashed against the pavement and everything. He would OBVIOUSLY have felt like his life was in danger, as it was because hitting your head off concrete is pretty dangerous at the end of the day. He pulled of his gun and shot to protect himself. All the same, being un-American, I don't think the cunts should have had guns in the first place.