[ILLoKWENT]

MadVerbs Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 3 / DrFunny: 4
Xplissit Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 2 / DrFunny: 3
__________________


ok first off, i felt xplissits vote was too low, i'd give dr. funny a high 4 or low 5, because he did implement concepts the right way, although slightly played, multis were aight, mad verbs had the closer rating, but unfortunately his expo, was subpar, considering he's in an FVC contest.. it explained a few things about whats wrong wit both verses, yet failed to give an example and solution, just generalizations... had he added that , he wouldve gotten my vote, but as it stands , it doesnt help the battler out, imo, xplissit again you dont need to bar by bar breakdown this type of low tier battles, i'd drop maybe one or two examples from each verse which were the highlights, and the low points, followed wit what was wrong wit it and a solution based on your knowledge, plus it seems like your tryin to pawn them off by sayin, 'you should ask other vets or good battlers for help', as an FVC member, you should offer your own assistance.. as well, its like your a math professor, and a student has difficulty, yet you tellem to go see another math proffessor for help, which makes it seem your not confident in your own knowledge... thats how i see it... other than that you came off a bit more in depth in your analysis, so my vote here goes to xplissit

---------- Post added at 03:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:55 AM ----------

GRizzEAT Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 4 / DeftnessTemper: 3
OSKAR Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 5 / DeftnessTemper: 5


round 2 fvc voting critique

okay, id say grizz was probably the closest to a rating id givem, which would be both 4's, as far as voting goes, both, dont seem to be uppin their game as far as a good vote is concerned... very minimalist, general and vague, no real help or advice is given in either one, if i had to choose tho, grizz did somewhat offer help by tellin them to view his prior battles, but what good is that, if they're noobish and dont quite understand what to look for... my vote GRizzeat

---------- Post added at 03:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:14 AM ----------

GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5
MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1


okay, im leaning more toward grizzeat on this one, a bit more in depth, helpful, which is a good thing, grizz when you put a bit more effort in your votes, they come out alot better.. madverbs, again you came off hittin the nail on some of the problem areas, but failed to give up solutions or examples,.. these geralizations, only raises more questions from the combatants about why they did something wrong.. anyway, my vote this time around goes to grizzeat

[ILLoKWENT]

MadVerbs Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 3 / DrFunny: 4
Xplissit Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 2 / DrFunny: 3
__________________


ok first off, i felt xplissits vote was too low, i'd give dr. funny a high 4 or low 5, because he did implement concepts the right way, although slightly played, multis were aight, mad verbs had the closer rating, but unfortunately his expo, was subpar, considering he's in an FVC contest.. it explained a few things about whats wrong wit both verses, yet failed to give an example and solution, just generalizations... had he added that , he wouldve gotten my vote, but as it stands , it doesnt help the battler out, imo, xplissit again you dont need to bar by bar breakdown this type of low tier battles, i'd drop maybe one or two examples from each verse which were the highlights, and the low points, followed wit what was wrong wit it and a solution based on your knowledge, plus it seems like your tryin to pawn them off by sayin, 'you should ask other vets or good battlers for help', as an FVC member, you should offer your own assistance.. as well, its like your a math professor, and a student has difficulty, yet you tellem to go see another math proffessor for help, which makes it seem your not confident in your own knowledge... thats how i see it... other than that you came off a bit more in depth in your analysis, so my vote here goes to xplissit

---------- Post added at 03:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:55 AM ----------

GRizzEAT Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 4 / DeftnessTemper: 3
OSKAR Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 5 / DeftnessTemper: 5


round 2 fvc voting critique

okay, id say grizz was probably the closest to a rating id givem, which would be both 4's, as far as voting goes, both, dont seem to be uppin their game as far as a good vote is concerned... very minimalist, general and vague, no real help or advice is given in either one, if i had to choose tho, grizz did somewhat offer help by tellin them to view his prior battles, but what good is that, if they're noobish and dont quite understand what to look for... my vote GRizzeat

---------- Post added at 03:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:14 AM ----------

GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5
MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1


okay, im leaning more toward grizzeat on this one, a bit more in depth, helpful, which is a good thing, grizz when you put a bit more effort in your votes, they come out alot better.. madverbs, again you came off hittin the nail on some of the problem areas, but failed to give up solutions or examples,.. these geralizations, only raises more questions from the combatants about why they did something wrong.. anyway, my vote this time around goes to grizzeat