Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
lol dont make me sound like a racist
my point is if "HYPOTHETICALLY" since youre under the impression shits all false...if numbers point in a certain direction that a person is not "RACIST" to assume a certain person is more likely to commit a crime.
period
|
if "numbers" point in a "certain direction"
you couldn't be more vague.
142521 ----> lesbians secretly like dick
do i have a case?
joking... i understand you are saying "numbers" meaning statistics, meaning surveys taken by people, meaning of your nature, meaning any number of biases and motives.
answer my question jason, why do you think there will always be statistics about black crime rates but never a statistic about political corruption.
idunno where you were raised jason but its time to step out of it and take a look around
---------- Post added at 01:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:01 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just C
If the severity of crimes are open to 'professional Interpretation' how can you fully trust the stats? You can't.
---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:01 PM ----------
Statistics are mainly used through the media. Papers, Radio, Daily News "Figures show today that there are 3 million unemployed in the uk"
The Nazi regime realised that if they pushed it enough that they could use the media to better suit there cause.
This is nothing new. I don't want to get too deep into it but I would have thought history would have taught all of us to take anything GOV produced with the grain of salt it deserves. I'm not even saying crime rates ect are doctored on a large scale. I'm just saying it is possible.
|
boooyyaah jessy did his homework