how so? the circumstantial evidence is that a 40 year old man with a pistol violating parole killed a 17 year old kid with no record and junk food after alleged "broken nose and assault" that left no sign of damage or traces of blood
circumstantial evidence = guilty
---------- Post added at 09:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:15 AM ----------
and don't get me wrong, im not accusing you of being racist. all im saying is your priorities don't line up in this conversation
|