View Single Post
  #1  
Unread 02-06-2012, 09:50 PM
NOBLE
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,106
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

Not that I believe in "God" per se, but God has been described as the "unmoved, yet self-moved move." He is simultaneously the mover, what is moved and the move itself. If having a belly button is a sign of being birthed, is it possible that God could have a belly button because he birthed himself? We can say he birthed himself, yet is unborn.
If you say God created man and chickens from dust, what did he create the dust from? They say that in the beginning, God was all that exists. If God in fact did create anything, he must have created it from himself.
On a side note, consider that nothing is actually "created" because time isn't lineal and nothing is static. So what we would call "creation" is perpetual and couldn't be reduced to one event in time. Just a little food for thought...
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 09:50 PM   #1
 
NOBLE
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,106
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

Not that I believe in "God" per se, but God has been described as the "unmoved, yet self-moved move." He is simultaneously the mover, what is moved and the move itself. If having a belly button is a sign of being birthed, is it possible that God could have a belly button because he birthed himself? We can say he birthed himself, yet is unborn.
If you say God created man and chickens from dust, what did he create the dust from? They say that in the beginning, God was all that exists. If God in fact did create anything, he must have created it from himself.
On a side note, consider that nothing is actually "created" because time isn't lineal and nothing is static. So what we would call "creation" is perpetual and couldn't be reduced to one event in time. Just a little food for thought...
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote