Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums - View Single Post

**Black Book** · #3 10-09-2011, 06:35 PM

#5 won't work, because being a heavyweight has nothing to do with wins/losses. For example, say someone had a 10-10 record. That would be considered a welterweight according to your scale. What if they had done 20 battles against top tier members with wins against: RULE, ReeFer, & DaDDiO, & losses to UA, Jason, & Illimit? I'd classify a battler like this as a heavyweight. Your way would encourage sniping so that members could have that good record & "heavyweight" title.
—Knowledge dropped.

**Black Book** · 10-09-2011, 06:35 PM

#5 won't work, because being a heavyweight has nothing to do with wins/losses. For example, say someone had a 10-10 record. That would be considered a welterweight according to your scale. What if they had done 20 battles against top tier members with wins against: RULE, ReeFer, & DaDDiO, & losses to UA, Jason, & Illimit? I'd classify a battler like this as a heavyweight. Your way would encourage sniping so that members could have that good record & "heavyweight" title.
—Knowledge dropped.

10-09-2011, 06:35 PM	#3
Black Book <GrandScheme Shogunate> Ranked Text Record 145 Won / 55 Lost Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 3 Lost Join Date: Oct 2010 Voted: 0 audio / 529 text Posts: 5,426 Mentioned: 963 Post(s) Tagged: 33 Thread(s)	#5 won't work, because being a heavyweight has nothing to do with wins/losses. For example, say someone had a 10-10 record. That would be considered a welterweight according to your scale. What if they had done 20 battles against top tier members with wins against: RULE, ReeFer, & DaDDiO, & losses to UA, Jason, & Illimit? I'd classify a battler like this as a heavyweight. Your way would encourage sniping so that members could have that good record & "heavyweight" title. —Knowledge dropped. __________________
Offline