View Single Post
  #32  
Unread 02-19-2020, 06:34 PM
Brayne Ded
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)
Default

If I had it my way, voting would be simplified. There wouldn't be ratings. There wouldn't be a single "who won." There would be some boxes to check. Maybe 5? One for multis/rhyming, one for punchlines, one for wordplay, one for entertainment and one for flow. You check the box for the battler you think did better on that particular criteria. When you're done, that decides your vote. No expos on votes, no ratings and a crystal clear reason why someone beat you. If everyone votes the other guy better on wordplay, you'd know to work on wordplay. Just a dumb idea that will never be implemented but there it is.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2020, 06:34 PM   #32
 
Brayne Ded
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Voted: 0 audio / 36 text
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)


Default

If I had it my way, voting would be simplified. There wouldn't be ratings. There wouldn't be a single "who won." There would be some boxes to check. Maybe 5? One for multis/rhyming, one for punchlines, one for wordplay, one for entertainment and one for flow. You check the box for the battler you think did better on that particular criteria. When you're done, that decides your vote. No expos on votes, no ratings and a crystal clear reason why someone beat you. If everyone votes the other guy better on wordplay, you'd know to work on wordplay. Just a dumb idea that will never be implemented but there it is.
__________________
Offline  
Reply With Quote