Thread: Broken multies?
View Single Post
  #13  
Unread 01-22-2020, 05:56 PM
Locchart
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonganKidd View Post
Even when it goes from

GENIE WIT REQUESTS = REALLY LEAVE , MESS = LIEVE HES, “DISTRESS”

The way that looks to me is 5, 4, 5, even though I can assume the "a"s and "in" are emphasized, and apart of the scheme. They must be capped to show placement and emphasis for a smoother read.
You're supposed to assume they're part of the scheme. Just because they're not capped in the middle of the scheme doesn't mean they disappear.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2020, 05:56 PM   #13
 
Locchart
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonganKidd View Post
Even when it goes from

GENIE WIT REQUESTS = REALLY LEAVE , MESS = LIEVE HES, “DISTRESS”

The way that looks to me is 5, 4, 5, even though I can assume the "a"s and "in" are emphasized, and apart of the scheme. They must be capped to show placement and emphasis for a smoother read.
You're supposed to assume they're part of the scheme. Just because they're not capped in the middle of the scheme doesn't mean they disappear.
 
Reply With Quote