Thread: The Rican Topic
View Single Post
  #28  
Unread 12-23-2019, 07:19 PM
REZN
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 559
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
13 Won / 10 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seul View Post
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.

In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
Banning multis isn't the move, chief. Think of how much fun you're preventing for people who don't use them nefariously. Consider Danny Tanner, as an example. Or any of Brayne Ded's multis. That's why no one's jumping on board the ban multis train.
__________________


Reply With Quote
Unread 12-23-2019, 07:19 PM   #28
 
REZN
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.78/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
13 Won / 10 Lost
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Voted: 1 audio / 54 text
Posts: 559
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seul View Post
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.

In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
Banning multis isn't the move, chief. Think of how much fun you're preventing for people who don't use them nefariously. Consider Danny Tanner, as an example. Or any of Brayne Ded's multis. That's why no one's jumping on board the ban multis train.
__________________


Offline  
Reply With Quote