[Shodan]

Originally Posted by Celsius

Idk it's kind of like losing part of the history of the site.

So? Screenshot the original all-time rankings page.

Frankly, the current all-time rankings mean jack shit outside of archaeological dig site value. A lot of the people on it are garbage by today's standards (and possibly by their days' standards, too), and even the people on it who are good aren't necessarily placed anywhere close to where they be placed on an accurate list of the best battlers in LB history.

I want rankings to be based at least 50% on how good someone is, or at least how good the unwashed masses THINK someone is. With the current system, you can just snipe noobs ad nauseam until you hit #1 of all time (looking at you, Bnas and Macc).

[Shodan]

Originally Posted by Celsius

Idk it's kind of like losing part of the history of the site.

So? Screenshot the original all-time rankings page.

Frankly, the current all-time rankings mean jack shit outside of archaeological dig site value. A lot of the people on it are garbage by today's standards (and possibly by their days' standards, too), and even the people on it who are good aren't necessarily placed anywhere close to where they be placed on an accurate list of the best battlers in LB history.

I want rankings to be based at least 50% on how good someone is, or at least how good the unwashed masses THINK someone is. With the current system, you can just snipe noobs ad nauseam until you hit #1 of all time (looking at you, Bnas and Macc).