Originally Posted by Babylon

When I mention structure it usually is in reference to, in part, how concisely a writer can produce his material compared to the opponent- in that the ability to convey a more cohesive idea, in a more accessible manner, is more obvious in one writer than the other.

I'd imagine another big part of the "structure" category would be how adeptly one executes a grasp on multis. Less in their perfection syllabically, and more in their overall placement within the bars.

But, this is a subjective perspective, right? Is this how everyone who votes based on structure(not just those mentioning structure in their vote) considers and defines it?

And if not, can it be categorized as an objective medium on which to vote?

Originally Posted by Babylon

When I mention structure it usually is in reference to, in part, how concisely a writer can produce his material compared to the opponent- in that the ability to convey a more cohesive idea, in a more accessible manner, is more obvious in one writer than the other.

I'd imagine another big part of the "structure" category would be how adeptly one executes a grasp on multis. Less in their perfection syllabically, and more in their overall placement within the bars.

But, this is a subjective perspective, right? Is this how everyone who votes based on structure(not just those mentioning structure in their vote) considers and defines it?

And if not, can it be categorized as an objective medium on which to vote?