View Single Post
  #8  
Unread 11-14-2018, 06:32 PM
Rant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Student View Post
Besides, we've got a hard enough time running a nation of 330 million among 50 states and while the U.S. does exploit Central & South America, I don't think it should "officially" run those countries as well.
Well, the implication here is false. That the U.S. would "run" these countries. It wouldn't. Unionization is an agreed upon domain of politics, with contribution from multiple governmental bodies. Not a singular point of power.
Reply With Quote
Unread 11-14-2018, 06:32 PM   #8
 
Rant
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Student View Post
Besides, we've got a hard enough time running a nation of 330 million among 50 states and while the U.S. does exploit Central & South America, I don't think it should "officially" run those countries as well.
Well, the implication here is false. That the U.S. would "run" these countries. It wouldn't. Unionization is an agreed upon domain of politics, with contribution from multiple governmental bodies. Not a singular point of power.
 
Reply With Quote