Originally Posted by X-Calibur

What I find more interesting is how @UnEtH1CaL has argued this until he is blue in the face and yet his fellow leader @Lockhart votes the other way lol ...

I see one of my crew votes yes but he isn’t a leader at least me and KG aim the same page

We're different people. Honestly, I vote on this shit for you guys. If ACs stay exactly as it is, cutting the inactive members, nothing changes. We're far and away the best current crew on LB. But you guys need to have the opportunity to build a resistance and a challenge. Apoc is nothing right now. But who knows? In 3 months you might make the right signings and they might become a problem. You guys need a fair shot to compete, so I disagree with this.

Originally Posted by X-Calibur

What I find more interesting is how @UnEtH1CaL has argued this until he is blue in the face and yet his fellow leader @Lockhart votes the other way lol ...

I see one of my crew votes yes but he isn’t a leader at least me and KG aim the same page

We're different people. Honestly, I vote on this shit for you guys. If ACs stay exactly as it is, cutting the inactive members, nothing changes. We're far and away the best current crew on LB. But you guys need to have the opportunity to build a resistance and a challenge. Apoc is nothing right now. But who knows? In 3 months you might make the right signings and they might become a problem. You guys need a fair shot to compete, so I disagree with this.