View Single Post
  #6  
Unread 06-16-2018, 12:38 AM
NOBLE
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockhart View Post
Yes. Would be best to have a more dedicated group of people who could vote more consistently on battles with solid judgment skills. Simple as that.

Side-note: If you're going to appoint them to be FVC, it should be made to where they are not blockable. It would be completely pointless to have them appointed by staff just to have them blocked by a regular member over a vote that they deem to be a hate vote. (If there is actual evidence to a hate vote, that is obviously a different story).
Definitely agree with FVC being unblockable.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-16-2018, 12:38 AM   #6
 
NOBLE
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockhart View Post
Yes. Would be best to have a more dedicated group of people who could vote more consistently on battles with solid judgment skills. Simple as that.

Side-note: If you're going to appoint them to be FVC, it should be made to where they are not blockable. It would be completely pointless to have them appointed by staff just to have them blocked by a regular member over a vote that they deem to be a hate vote. (If there is actual evidence to a hate vote, that is obviously a different story).
Definitely agree with FVC being unblockable.
Offline   Reply With Quote