View Single Post
  #4  
Unread 02-06-2018, 06:53 PM
NOBLE
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,104
Mentioned: 3632 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

They're doing it because it is mandated by law. I'm not sure to what extent though. From my understanding, the person from whatever underrepresented group (it's not just race, but also gender and sometimes sexual orientation) still has to qualify, or at least meet the minimum qualification requirements for that position. So I'm not sure that necessarily means "companies/universities regularly chose a less qualified candidate just because of their race." I read somewhere that white women (next to Asians) are actually the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action. It's not necessarily always about race, and the underrepresented still has to be qualified.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2018, 06:53 PM   #4
 
NOBLE
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,104
Mentioned: 3632 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

They're doing it because it is mandated by law. I'm not sure to what extent though. From my understanding, the person from whatever underrepresented group (it's not just race, but also gender and sometimes sexual orientation) still has to qualify, or at least meet the minimum qualification requirements for that position. So I'm not sure that necessarily means "companies/universities regularly chose a less qualified candidate just because of their race." I read somewhere that white women (next to Asians) are actually the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action. It's not necessarily always about race, and the underrepresented still has to be qualified.
Offline   Reply With Quote