View Single Post
  #9  
Unread 10-31-2017, 12:12 AM
NOBLE
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Babylon View Post
Do you think North Korea would happily submit as those bombs begin falling or are you drastically overconfident in the ability of a US surgical strike on north korea? The moment the US starts "leveling the place with bombs" are you so sure kim jong wouldnt just detonate his armament wherever he could? Resulting in mass casualties not even considering the mass death leveling the place with bombs would provide. Denuclearization diplomatically isn't a foreseeable plan either to me. Kim jong is too unstable. Likely gonna end in some kind of combat situation be it small or large/soon or far from now.
Was there something in what I said that suggests I think North Korea would happily submit to bombardment by the US? I'm sure they will have some kind of response, and that South Korea, Japan and Guam would probably get the worst of it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 10-31-2017, 12:12 AM   #9
 
NOBLE
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.05/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
4 Won / 0 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.05/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.71/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
1 Won / 1 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2011
Voted: 408 audio / 1061 text
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Babylon View Post
Do you think North Korea would happily submit as those bombs begin falling or are you drastically overconfident in the ability of a US surgical strike on north korea? The moment the US starts "leveling the place with bombs" are you so sure kim jong wouldnt just detonate his armament wherever he could? Resulting in mass casualties not even considering the mass death leveling the place with bombs would provide. Denuclearization diplomatically isn't a foreseeable plan either to me. Kim jong is too unstable. Likely gonna end in some kind of combat situation be it small or large/soon or far from now.
Was there something in what I said that suggests I think North Korea would happily submit to bombardment by the US? I'm sure they will have some kind of response, and that South Korea, Japan and Guam would probably get the worst of it.
__________________
Offline   Reply With Quote