View Single Post
  #15  
Unread 01-23-2017, 05:00 PM
Babylon Babylon is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,132
Mentioned: 1428 Post(s)
Tagged: 40 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
63 Won / 15 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
66 Won / 21 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
2 Won / 0 Lost
Default

Well firstly there should be a written standard for more intelligent forms of fair voting immediately read by any new FVC member, if there isn't one already (which why on earth wouldn't there be?)

Just because a field is subjective doesn't exclude it from being able to be explained in detail to lead others to the right side of the fence > Which is fair voting > Which is easily explained

The problem with the FVC was that it was too easy to bullshit your way into without _ACTUALLY_ being a fair voter. This could be remedied by simply having a person review the WAY the fvc members vote both before being included and semi-regularly after, and the subsequent removal of those who are shitty examples of fair voters. To my view it was just inefficiently ran in some aspects, it was a great concept. Though, admittedly less great when the active userbase caps at 30 max.

So, perhaps it should be on the backburner for now.
__________________
.

Last edited by Babylon; 01-23-2017 at 05:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2017, 05:00 PM   #15
 
Babylon Babylon is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.88/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
63 Won / 15 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.88/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.84/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
66 Won / 21 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
2 Won / 0 Lost
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Voted: 289 audio / 238 text
Posts: 4,132
Mentioned: 1428 Post(s)
Tagged: 40 Thread(s)


Default

Well firstly there should be a written standard for more intelligent forms of fair voting immediately read by any new FVC member, if there isn't one already (which why on earth wouldn't there be?)

Just because a field is subjective doesn't exclude it from being able to be explained in detail to lead others to the right side of the fence > Which is fair voting > Which is easily explained

The problem with the FVC was that it was too easy to bullshit your way into without _ACTUALLY_ being a fair voter. This could be remedied by simply having a person review the WAY the fvc members vote both before being included and semi-regularly after, and the subsequent removal of those who are shitty examples of fair voters. To my view it was just inefficiently ran in some aspects, it was a great concept. Though, admittedly less great when the active userbase caps at 30 max.

So, perhaps it should be on the backburner for now.
__________________
.

Last edited by Babylon; 01-23-2017 at 05:04 PM.
Offline  
Reply With Quote