View Single Post
  #48  
Unread 06-23-2014, 10:19 AM
Hubert Cumberdale
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViTRiOL View Post
Yay! What do I win? I'll link you my Paypal account and I shall expect £3,000 by sunrise.

---------- Post added at 05:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 AM ----------



Savages only tell lies. We're determined that the third man is a savage.

"Both are lying," (in Savage perspective) = "Both are telling the truth."

---------- Post added at 05:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 AM ----------

The third man's Savage lie validates the first man's Noble claim.

---------- Post added at 06:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 AM ----------

So to put it blatantly.

If the the third man was a Noble, the first two would HAVE to be Savages.

Surely that's understandable now?
He is saying BOTH are lying. This is a lie, we know this much.

But perhaps that means only ONE is lying.
Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2014, 10:19 AM   #48
 
Hubert Cumberdale
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViTRiOL View Post
Yay! What do I win? I'll link you my Paypal account and I shall expect £3,000 by sunrise.

---------- Post added at 05:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 AM ----------



Savages only tell lies. We're determined that the third man is a savage.

"Both are lying," (in Savage perspective) = "Both are telling the truth."

---------- Post added at 05:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 AM ----------

The third man's Savage lie validates the first man's Noble claim.

---------- Post added at 06:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 AM ----------

So to put it blatantly.

If the the third man was a Noble, the first two would HAVE to be Savages.

Surely that's understandable now?
He is saying BOTH are lying. This is a lie, we know this much.

But perhaps that means only ONE is lying.
 
Reply With Quote