Yay! What do I win? I'll link you my Paypal account and I shall expect £3,000 by sunrise.
---------- Post added at 05:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
@ ViTRiOL, I don't get how you're concluding that the first man is noble. The third guy claimed they were both lying. BOTH of them might not have been lying. Perhaps only one was lying (The first one).
Also, the second guy only agreed that the first guy SAID he was noble, not that he actually was.
There is no possible way to conclude what the first man's position is. |
Savages only tell lies. We're determined that the third man is a savage.
"Both are lying," (in Savage perspective) = "Both are telling the truth."
---------- Post added at 05:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 AM ----------
The third man's Savage lie validates the first man's Noble claim.
---------- Post added at 06:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 AM ----------
So to put it blatantly.
If the the third man was a Noble, the first two would HAVE to be Savages.
Surely that's understandable now?