Nicholas
06-30-2019, 04:58 PM
Right, since Punk and EtH have been banned for pissing off Muggz and Pugz I'm going to keep documenting the abuse of power. Should I be banned for doing so I would be grateful if one or more of you take my place.
Let's start with Pugz's promise not to ban EtH for trolling which he posted on the very same day EtH was banned for.... trolling.
i troll you everyday.. if youre gonna get banned itll be for a legit reason dont worry... trolling is allowed but you know the limits and if you want to exceed them then youre in bannable territory.. no personal info.. no racist attacks.. no sabotage.. how far you wanna take it is completely on you..
But let's see what GUTS's justification for this ban is...
Trolling
(Infraction points: 15 Expires: 3 months)
Blatantly posting antagonistic material just to get a reaction from other users is considered trolling.
this is something eth and punk did daily, and it's a small offense, until it happens non stop for almost a decade. we ll know eth as the biggest lb troll, so to say he didn't troll, would be a lie
But hold up, Pugz just told EtH he won't be infracted for trolling? And I assume the same applies to Punk.
Racism/Bigotry
(Infraction points: 30 Expires: 12 months)
while i hve noticed some semi racist comments from eth, the real issue here is bigotry. i define this as defamation of staff. all of his posts in the forums, trying to force mod against mod, were lies and manipulation. he admitted to it, said he was bored half the time. punk and eth both lied and put false information forward to push an agenda.
Even Guts admits this infraction isn't for racism or bigotry. He's just expanded the definition to include defamation of staff. That's right, you're no longer allowed to criticise or beef with staff members.
Repeat Offender
(Infraction points: 30 Expires: Never)
this pattern of behavior has existed for as long as these two have been around. i am disappointed that both eth and punk have chosen to do everything they can to ruin the site. all of these rules they broke over and over.
So to conclude they broke the rule against trolling which Pugz promised not to ban them for and they also broke the rule that Guts just made up repeatedly so their infractions are increased to justify a permaban. Isn't that just convenient.
Well, as fucked up as a decision as it might be it's democratic at least right? I mean Muggz told us it was here;
http://i64.tinypic.com/6f1lcj.png
But hold on, who voted on this poll? Certainly not Jimmy.
http://i63.tinypic.com/121apmq.png
How about other staff members current and former. How do they feel? Well so far in the shoutbox this is the list of staff members that have voiced concern at the ban.
OSKAR
Illokwent
Indianapolis Jones
Aggo*
Myself
*Aggo has actually gone to the lengths of deleting his account.
I suggest that if EtH and Punk aren't unbanned within 24 hours we should follow Aggo's lead. This isn't Lets Beef if you're not allowed to actually beef.
Let's start with Pugz's promise not to ban EtH for trolling which he posted on the very same day EtH was banned for.... trolling.
i troll you everyday.. if youre gonna get banned itll be for a legit reason dont worry... trolling is allowed but you know the limits and if you want to exceed them then youre in bannable territory.. no personal info.. no racist attacks.. no sabotage.. how far you wanna take it is completely on you..
But let's see what GUTS's justification for this ban is...
Trolling
(Infraction points: 15 Expires: 3 months)
Blatantly posting antagonistic material just to get a reaction from other users is considered trolling.
this is something eth and punk did daily, and it's a small offense, until it happens non stop for almost a decade. we ll know eth as the biggest lb troll, so to say he didn't troll, would be a lie
But hold up, Pugz just told EtH he won't be infracted for trolling? And I assume the same applies to Punk.
Racism/Bigotry
(Infraction points: 30 Expires: 12 months)
while i hve noticed some semi racist comments from eth, the real issue here is bigotry. i define this as defamation of staff. all of his posts in the forums, trying to force mod against mod, were lies and manipulation. he admitted to it, said he was bored half the time. punk and eth both lied and put false information forward to push an agenda.
Even Guts admits this infraction isn't for racism or bigotry. He's just expanded the definition to include defamation of staff. That's right, you're no longer allowed to criticise or beef with staff members.
Repeat Offender
(Infraction points: 30 Expires: Never)
this pattern of behavior has existed for as long as these two have been around. i am disappointed that both eth and punk have chosen to do everything they can to ruin the site. all of these rules they broke over and over.
So to conclude they broke the rule against trolling which Pugz promised not to ban them for and they also broke the rule that Guts just made up repeatedly so their infractions are increased to justify a permaban. Isn't that just convenient.
Well, as fucked up as a decision as it might be it's democratic at least right? I mean Muggz told us it was here;
http://i64.tinypic.com/6f1lcj.png
But hold on, who voted on this poll? Certainly not Jimmy.
http://i63.tinypic.com/121apmq.png
How about other staff members current and former. How do they feel? Well so far in the shoutbox this is the list of staff members that have voiced concern at the ban.
OSKAR
Illokwent
Indianapolis Jones
Aggo*
Myself
*Aggo has actually gone to the lengths of deleting his account.
I suggest that if EtH and Punk aren't unbanned within 24 hours we should follow Aggo's lead. This isn't Lets Beef if you're not allowed to actually beef.