PM for expos. Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-10-13 22:55:14

behind/bee-hind.. Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-10-13 23:22:17

gb Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 00:07:07

Enf/Phe: A lil underwhelmed to be honest. Feel like you guys are capable of better. That being said i did like the Clancy line and the Taste of victory closer. // War/Illo: Again i feel like you guys didnt bring your a-games either. Illo i really wanted to like the karate kid wordplay but the wording for the first meaning was too off for me. I liked the jet pack and fashion shows punches. The polly lines were really predictable and hurt the verse imo. // Overall i felt one team was more consistant over the 16. Genny rates tho. 1/ Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 04:25:41

that karate kid line hung on by such a little thread the way it was tweaked i literally had my head tilted readin it..but i laughed and applauded for the creativity in the attempt...im still gettin used to enjoyin these battles cause they all sound exactly the same wit the "like a" and "make ya" and "fair fights" i appreciate guys like you that are good at it cause its tough to a reg joe but when the verses are close in every aspect with nothin standin out (in general) individuality is out thhe window...the art is in teh formula of wordplay, multis alll that i know and i see when someone is good but alot have been lackin that originality..my winner i enjoyed his smarts throughout.. Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 05:57:29

I feel one team had the smoother read, Maybe It's cause they worked together well and it showed the other had nice concepts and good punches but the wording was iffy at times still a close match up . Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 12:02:10

dope drops never heard some extra cool shit like that from enfinite tho the other had some hard shit too but staying on task w/harder punches got it for me. fv gb vb asap Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 12:05:01

It was close, but I thought Enfinite was a little bit cleaner, and was more coherent, and war zone's bird lines didn't make sense and it seemed a little forced. Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 12:21:27

Loved this. Bood Battle Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 12:28:08

Both were meh... Leaning this way though. Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 12:44:32

Good read from the first team, woulda liked to have known when the writers switched over but other than that good job. Second team world well togeth as well and had som nice concepts. Both teams came with punches and flow was nice... So it was a close one. Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 16:13:11

Seen better from both. I Feel my winner here was a bit more creative. My losers concepts were nice but a couple werent executed well. Wording could have gone differently. Fairs in Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 19:57:59

Being a audio head i find alot of text lines to be stretched very thin..i tend to find myself thinking, "that wouldnt work well at all in a audio battle"..so when i come across a battle like this i usually focus on how easily it reads and the impact of the punch..based on that it couldve went either way but my FLY VOTE is in Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 21:19:13

One team maintained a more consistent style and execution, almost as if it was written by one person. Both sides had some wording issues, but one more than the other. There wasn't any outstanding punches imo but there were a few concepts that had potential. Overall, I felt one team had the more enjoyable read. fairs. Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-14 21:28:44

one side edged it a little Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-15 19:49:02

One team was more consistent the other used some played concepts but was still good close bout votes in Voted: SAND /
Posted on: 2013-10-16 16:23:01