ones use of multis was slightly better, other than that this was pretty close tbh, one edged tho with consistancy... pz Voted: Joe MuGGz / Aggo
Posted on: 2013-10-04 00:13:48

airght joe.. some of youre syllables were off, most notably in your very first punch. also your first punch was a little hard to read. it might have been your word structure or something idk. but after that you picked up some steam had a nice flow but got a little choppy towards the middle-end. fairly decent punches, set ups were ok. not outstanding, just a decent verse. agonize: i really liked your verse here. the set ups were fresh along with the punchlines. you had a great rhythm and swagger. the multis were on point along with the punches. this was a good read for me. that last line had me laughing, no lie. fair is in. mid-high Voted: Joe MuGGz / Aggo
Posted on: 2013-10-04 01:52:54

not a strong battle... mugz ---- i'll start off with whats wrong with your verse. all i see is words and are put together with jabs at most and no concepts. You've got to build it up by makin the bar relevant. I suggest u come up with a concept first then work around that. If there are any positives you have a nice flow and your multies fit well together. But i can't stress enough that multies and flow is not enough for u to win battles. Ag --- i could tell this was lightwork. smoke this fag bar is played out, seen it a couple of times. You had concepts that did impact on the punch but they were weak. The best bar of the battle from my eyes was your opener. Overall vote goes to the one who jabbed it out... stay up Voted: Joe MuGGz / Aggo
Posted on: 2013-10-04 19:57:35

fairs in Voted: Joe MuGGz / Aggo
Posted on: 2013-10-05 16:17:16