Both seems to have a hit and miss approach. One had some weak lines and the other didn't seem to attempt at punches at all. At least conceptual punches. One broke a shit ton multies while the other was for the most part consistent with multies. It was decent, seen better from both. Comment Only
Posted on: 2013-01-07 15:41:09

Not great. Still, some good punches. Voted: UhMAZING /
Posted on: 2013-01-07 15:54:49

One was a level up in most aspects here.. My choice brought some nice set-ups, good concepts and good execution while his opponent lacked creativity with these aspects.. Overall decent spar and if a tip list is wanted then ask.. Voted: UhMAZING /
Posted on: 2013-01-08 15:52:24

fv no h8 Voted: UhMAZING /
Posted on: 2013-01-09 11:14:06

UhMAZING: Your multies weren't multies. You capped words that didn't even rhyme. All of your multies were one syllable but you capped more than one syllable. You also did not throw really any punches. You tried a little of comedy with that alright jab but it didn't really work. You didn't throw any real punches. Just some jabs.. Work on throwing real punches...... Cak3d: You came with some concepts that lead to relating punches but you didn't set them up well. You had too much filler and all of the set up didn't really tie into the concept. You did bring some concepts and jabs though. Work on making them fresher, though... Fair is in. One had more punches and impact. Voted: UhMAZING /
Posted on: 2013-01-09 19:37:34

One here was on a whole other level. Fairs in Voted: UhMAZING /
Posted on: 2013-01-10 02:49:20