'invade' referring to healthy cells being invaded by cancer cells Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-12-27 17:13:35

haa good to see you again bro, nice drop Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-12-27 17:32:38

No doubt man. Good luck. Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-12-27 17:37:45

Damn, typo- It's not suppose to be chief it should be chef. My bad.. Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-12-27 17:41:00

Fairs in. One had less forced multies(they did not match up) and concepts were better as well. Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-27 18:23:40

Honest rate. Foo your ish was all over the place. You had some concept but you never executed them properly. There are lots of flaws such as off sylabel multis and wording. This really damaged your rating. Mad that looked light. Little forced in places but the punches were all right. some nice material there, Youre improving. Fair is in Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-27 21:17:45

DooX: Your multies are messed up Like Follow This Through doesn't match Tweet A Clue or Heat On You. You also change your multie schemes at the wrong times. The actual punch should not be different than the multies setting it up. You tried to use creative concepts to make punches but didn't execute causing them to be vague. Work on your execution. Verbs: You had some nice lines. Like Ruler On Ya Side line was pretty dope. However, you got too many one line jabs going. You aren't building up haymakers. If you could have set up that ruler line better with relating concepts, it wouldhave been crack! Just work on setting bars up with concepts like that one. Overall, one executed much better than his opponent & their bars hit harder. Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-28 00:31:43

Honestly those were some poor drops. Once again this site boggles my mind. If you're unwilling to use caps lock and produce simple, childish multies, you won't win. Ranked 361 and 975 all time... SMH. No hate, I'm just observing and explaining what I'm seein. Crazy shit.....tweet a clue?? Lets be realistic... Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-28 00:57:20

DOOX- okay, first off the multis in your first bar was off, setup, basically lookd like fractured ideas or sentences, because first your buildin up wit 'twitter' references, than you end wit a mexican food concept? you need to follow thru on your ideas til the end.. dont go half ass, next bar you mentioned 'hood's takin chemo'.. whats that sopposed to mean? that his hood is terminally ill? and if your tryin to reference chemo wit invade, the relation is too vague a bit of a stretch, even wit the expo.. rest of your bars were pretty much same, irrelevant setup towards punch.. what i did like was the fact a few of your multis were fairly decent, and you attempted concept to flips.. my advice is work on better setups.. MAD- i like the setup, high roller, used in straight reference as a gamblin relation, and as part of your buildup toward your smoke dope w chong.. probably a bit better wording wouldve improved on your build a bit more, because using highroller and refering it to gamblin etc. was leading me to think your buildin your punch in that way, towards a either a funny punch about his lack of money , or something wit gambling.. next bar, 'cooler i woud hide' was filler imo, didnt need to be in the bar at all, ruler concepts are pretty much played, and this one didnt bring any new angle to the table, next bar was probably your best line, first multi tho, irelavent, filler, how is that have anything to wit the meth, or him fuckin his coke lines up? if you start wit snitchin, then continue that idea, tell everyone in a clever and funny way, what happens or how he snitches bigtime... end closer was ok at best, okay my winner here brought slightly better concept/relations,in a slightly more polished verse, scheme wise..fairs in Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-28 03:20:08

I just cant give a full rating to people who don't rhyme ON A FLOW. I hate having to bounce around to find what is supposed to be rhyming and when, when it should be obvious. Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-28 10:50:24

DooX: Your multis are broken big time and most of the words you capped didn't even rhyme at all. Your concepts were there but the set ups were off and mostly because your multis were broken which lacked hard hitting punch power. Also no need for putting (this) if its not for wordplay it messes with the reader just add it into your expos Verbs: You had some nice bars and my favorite was the ruler line and the hells kitchen one was dope too. I liked the way you had set up, punch set up, punch going it shows you can still have the flow on point but throw constant punches. Some of the jabs you threw just needed a little extra heat on them. The concepts were nice though Fairs in fellas good spar Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-28 11:59:51

pretty simple, the loser here had punches but didn't execute and filler really did them in during this bout. the winner wasn't to to much doper but had nicer setups but punches weren't the most original i've senn.. also both could work on flow// GONZO vote Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-28 15:22:07

DooX had a lot of played concepts that were executed poorly. The punches were less then mediocre, the flow & rhyme scheme were nice though. Verbs had one or two fresh bars with good execution, it was a quick, smooth read and I enjoyed it.. Strong wording & better metaphores got this. fv is in Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-29 06:01:39

One had much stronger structure. Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-29 13:45:28

Setting up his punches won this battle. Gotta have structure fv Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-29 18:01:34

My winner had some pretty weak punches mixed with some really hard ones, enough to take the challenger out. The winner also had slightly better multis and flow tho the challenger wasnt bad in that area. a couple of swaggy setups and punches takes this FV all day Voted: DooX / B U R D E N
Posted on: 2012-12-30 03:56:25