This was a good battle here. There isn't much i can say that hasn't been said already by the FVC members. Not a bad battle here from either. Fair in, Fuels out. Posted on: 2012-08-29 20:40:54

Insane/in-shane...Sh ane Mcmahon some wrestler who's theme song is called 'money'! Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-08-29 15:13:08

CLASSICK u BASTID!!! Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-08-29 15:15:06

one was smoother, made more sense, stk try not to force your concepts, Oskar , smooth read, try to spice up the wordplay or punches a lil. also a couple forced multis on both sides ,dont know if you have an accent or what. but yeah, fv is in Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-29 16:59:31

This was a tough call. I felt StK's verse seemed a bit more direct and personal. OSKAR's verse was more readable, but towards the end where he was using dashes, it affected the readbility a little bit. With StK, I felt you actually brought better concepts to this, but your use of worplay wasn't fluent. For example, when your wordplayed Ceelo Green, you had "See's Low" on one end of the bar, and you stuck "Green" at the other end. If you're going to wordplay "Ceelo Green" then whatever you use should sound and flow just like that and not be broken and separated by several syllables. Otherwise, it will more than likely come off as being forced, choppy and unsmooth. You did the same thing with "Grizz Bear." The adolescent wordplay was also forced, but I liked the metaphor comparison to the Scared Straight program. OSKAR, I get where you were going with the first bar, but I felt the set-up and the punch could have been more relevant. The common point/running in parallels metaphor didn't really hit that hard to me. The STI/fucking sick line could have been reworded for a better effect...you did the same think StK did by separating the syllables. Artery/in vein line was so-so. Shane McMahon line didn't really hit cause it needed the expo. Overall---Lik e I said, this was very close, and I think it could go either way due to how much weight people place on certain things. Both have potential as well as areas they could polish. I felt one was a little bit more consistent though, so I'm giving the vote to him. Fairness. Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-29 18:13:34

Claaaaaaaaaaaaaassic k! Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-08-29 19:39:39

okay STK- right off to bat, your first line was worded awkward, stare way slow jam? just doesnt read natural, and the next line, tear face , no man? again, reads like an awkward sentence.. i wouldve said , 'without a STARE OR A SLOW JAM., this way it reads normal, and your still relating the step/ stair, locked in step/slowjam.. next bar was extremely long, wordwise, and the wordplay was pretty played fam.., yeah, your tyin in grizz to bare, but the way the sentence is written, your basically dissing grizz sayin he cant bare the weight of leading the charge... this is an 8 liner, so imo, you need to make each line an attack against your opponent. your adolescent wordplay was probably your boldest and clever line in your entire verse..good ish..last bar was creative, but a bit too complex to the point it reads a bit awkward/forced..imo, OSKAR- your first concept was simpler, and easier to understand, but the multi was mismatched bigtime, even as a slant rhyme, com-pare-i- sen, and mar-a-thon, dont rhyme , fatties and fuckin neither,, common point concept and runnin in parallels related well, but again mismatched multis,next bar the st, and as good as i, made no sense to me, st and as good as i, when reading the way its written, seems like your sayin he's as good as you..? and if you were tryin to relate STI, as not being STD , so he aint sick... it works but kinda weak imo.. i would ve written it ' i know this PUNK AINT SHIT, cause even if 'st' came close i' he wont be regarded as SOMETHNG SICK, bastid beat, fuckin sick? again poor end rhymes.. bottom line is both had some weak attempts at concept /punches, although my winner came wit one decent hit, his multis schemes were more consistent , on a technical level...fairs in.. Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-30 04:55:47

imo there were a lot of flaws here from both and its really hard to choose... My choice had wording issues throughout his multies and forced wordplay but had some nice concepts although his verse didn't really flow to well.. His opponent's verse flowed nicely but had also had wording issues throughout his multies and verse but also had decent concepts and played ones but didn't execute them strongly... This was a tough call but my votes in... Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-30 11:56:57

SQUAD! Comment Only
Posted on: 2012-08-30 21:05:30

not a bad read but a tough one to call, ive changed my mind a couple of times. i think one came with more concepts but had trouble wording them right to get the most impact out of them, also at times it seemed a bit forced. i also think he cud have got another line in but wasted it on expo'ing his word play which shud have been done in the comments section, 8 lines isnt a lot, so i think that was a total waste of a bar. the other was more basic and had some multi/scheme issues but the lines seemed to connect better and make a bit more sense. one had more complexity but weaker end resuts, the other was simple with stronger end results. votes in. Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-31 10:34:25

.... Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-31 18:16:32

The winner, IMO, had better concepts and was more consistent with harder hitting punches. The other had smooth flow and some strong jabs here and there, but I don't feel they were strong enough to earn him a victory. StK: I feel you drug out your last few setups. I'm digging the wp, though, g. Keep grindin! OSKAR: Multies were mismatched and I feel you fell off towards the end. You had some strong punches and a smooth flow going for you, though. Good shit to both, respect the fair, and return the favor! Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-08-31 18:49:56

Fv and gb keep it up Voted: TheAnonP /
Posted on: 2012-09-01 11:03:27